Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 Expected To Be The First Product Review

SRI International announced an exclusive license deal with Samsung to use its IOM (Iris on the Move) technology to Samsung for use in its mobile devices

The first product among the list is the Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 tablet which will come with this technology built-in to make use of the iris recognition, hinted by SRI in their announcement.

samsung tab 4, galaxy tab 4, samsung galaxy, samsung galaxy s4, samsung galaxy 3, samsung laptop, samsung tablet, laptop, laptops, best laptop brand, samsung phone

SRI International today announced an exclusive license of Iris on the Move® (IOM) technologies to Samsung for use in Samsung mobile products. Additionally SRI has entered into a supply agreement to start production and sales of the IOM technology-embedded Samsung mobile products for B2B applications. The initial product for this supply agreement will be a customized Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4 tablet with a built-in IOM iris module. Galaxy Tab S line up was introduced back at Mobile World Congress 2014, but we didn’t see its successor this year. The Mobile World Congress 2015 is history, but rather than the new tablets, Samsung introduced its latest flagship devices, the Galaxy S6 and Galaxy S6 Edge.

SRI mentioned the product will be unveiled at the “SIA New Product Showcase at ISC West 2015 (the largest security industry trade show in the U.S.) and offered worldwide through SRI partners and resellers.

We don’t know much about the upcoming product from the folks at Samsung featuring this new technology, but we’ll update you as soon as we get any other information about the upcoming Galaxy Tab S 8.4. Source : Sri

Nividia GeForce GTX Review

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX is back with another Titan, and this time they are looking to recapture a lot of the magic of the original Titan. First teased back at GDC 2015 in an Epic Unreal Engine session, and used to drive more than a couple of demos at the show, the GTX Titan X gives NVIDIA’s flagship video card line the Maxwell treatment, bringing with it all of the new features and sizable performance gains that we saw from Maxwell last year with the GTX 980. To be sure, this isn’t a reprise of the original Titan – there are some important differences that make the new Titan not the same kind of prosumer card the original was – but from a performance standpoint NVIDIA is looking to make the GTX Titan X as memorable as the original. Which is to say that it’s by far the fastest single-GPU card on the market once again.

NVIDIA has assembled a new Maxwell GPU, GM200 (aka Big Maxwell). We’ll dive into GM200 in detail a bit later, but from a high-level standpoint GM200 is the GM204 taken to its logical extreme. It’s bigger, faster, and yes, more power hungry than GM204 before it. In fact at 8 billion transistors occupying 601mm2 it’s NVIDIA’s largest GPU ever. And for the first time in quite some time, virtually every last millimeter is dedicated to graphics performance, which coupled with Maxwell’s performance efficiency makes it a formidable foe.

Diving into the specs, GM200 can for most intents and purposes be considered a GM204 + 50%. It has 50% more CUDA cores, 50% more memory bandwidth, 50% more ROPs, and almost 50% more die size. Packing a fully enabled version of GM200, this gives the GTX Titan X 3072 CUDA cores and 192 texture units(spread over 24 SMMs), paired with 96 ROPs. Meanwhile considering that even the GM204-backed GTX 980 could outperform the GK110-backed GTX Titans and GTX 780 Ti thanks to Maxwell’s architectural improvements – 1 Maxwell CUDA core is quite a bit more capable than Kepler in practice, as we’ve seen – GTX Titan X is well geared to shoot well past the previous Titans and the GTX 980.

graphic cards for laptops, nvidia laptop graphics card, buy nvidia graphics card, nvidia gpu, what are the best laptops for gaming, the best laptop brands, best laptops brands, best gaming laptop brands

 the GTX Titan Black this is one of the few areas where GTX Titan X doesn’t have an advantage in raw specifications – there’s really nowhere to go until HBM is ready – however in this case numbers can be deceptive as NVIDIA has heavily invested in memory compression for Maxwell to get more out of the 336GB/sec of memory bandwidth they have available. The 12GB of VRAM on the other hand continues NVIDIA’s trend of equipping Titan cards with as much VRAM as they can handle, and should ensure that the GTX Titan X has VRAM to spare for years to come. Meanwhile sitting between the GPU’s functional units and the memory bus is a relatively massive 3MB of L2 cache, retaining the same 32K:1 cache:ROP ratio of Maxwell 2 and giving the GPU more cache than ever before to try to keep memory operations off of the memory bus.

As for clockspeeds, as with the rest of the Maxwell lineup GTX Titan X is getting a solid clockspeed bump from its Kepler predecessor. The base clockspeed is up to 1Ghz (reported as 1002MHz by NVIDIA’s tools) while the boost clock is 1075MHz. This is roughly 100MHz (~10%) ahead of the GTX Titan Black and will further push the GTX Titan X ahead. However as is common with larger GPUs, NVIDIA has backed off on clockspeeds a bit compared to the smaller GM204, so GTX Titan X won’t clock quite as high as GTX 980 and the overall performance difference on paper is closer to 33% when comparing boost clocks.

Power consumption on the other hand is right where we’d expect it to be for a Titan class card. NVIDIA’s official TDP for GTX Titan X is 250W, the same as the previous single-GPU Titan cards (and other consumer GK110 cards). Like the original GTX Titan, expect GTX Titan X to spend a fair bit of its time TDP-bound; 250W is generous – a 51% increase over GTX 980 – but then again so is the number of transistors that need to be driven. Overall this puts GTX Titan X on the high side of the power consumption curve (just like GTX Titan before it), but it’s the price for that level of performance. Practically speaking 250W is something of a sweet spot for NVIDIA, as they know how to efficiently dissipate that much heat and it ensures GTX Titan X is a drop-in replacement for GTX Titan/780 in any existing system designs. Via : Anandtech

Microsoft’s Cortana voice assistant heading to Android, iOS Report Review

Apple’s phones and tablets have Siri. Google Android has “OK Google.” And Windows Phone has Cortana. But the lines might get blurry soon.

Cortana is Microsoft’s voice assistant software which lets you search the web, set reminders, initiate phone calls, and much more. While the service was first introduced for Windows Phone, it will also be available to desktop and tablet users when Microsoft releases Windows 10.

best smartphone 2015, samrtphone review, samsung, lenovo, tablet, android
It’s not clear if you’ll be able to use all of Cortana’s features on an iPhone or Android device, since Microsoft’s personal assistant won’t be built into the operating system and will instead run as an app… which means it won’t have full system access and will have the same limitations you’d expect from any third-party app.

According to Reuters, Microsoft is also working on an artificial intelligence project called “Einstein” which is designed to make Cortana more powerful. Among other things, it’ll be able to “read and understand email” and other items in order to provide you information you might need before you even ask for it. For example it could remind you when it’s time to leave or the airport based on an email confirmation for a flight reservation.

Google Now already does something similar for Android users, while Apple’s Siri is designed mostly to respond to requests rather than attempting to anticipate your needs.

Reuters reports that Microsoft plans to launch Cortana apps for Android and iOS.

ASRock X99 Extreme-11 - Eighteen SATA Ports with Haswell - E Review

Featuring the six SATA ports from the PCH and eight from the bundled LSI 3008 onboard controller. Our sample back then used eight PCIe lanes for the controller and achieved 4 GBps maximum read and write sequential speeds when using an eight drive SSD RAID-0 SF-2281 array. Between the X79 and the X99 model came the Z87 Extreme11/ac which used the same LSI controller but bundled it with a port multiplier, giving sixteen SAS/SATA ports plus the six from the chipset for 22 total. When we come to the X99 Extreme11 in this review, we get the same 3008 controller without the multiplier) which adds eight ports to the ten from the PCH, giving eighteen in total.

One of the criticisms from the range is the lack of useful hardware RAID modes with the LSI 3008. It only gives RAID 0 and 1 (also 1E and 10) with no scope for RAID 5/6. This is partly because the controller comes without any cache (or albeit a very small one) which cannot help with managing such an array. ASRock's line on this is partly due to controller cost and complexity of implementation, suggesting that users who require these modes should use a software RAID solution. Users who want a hardware solution will have to buy a controller card that supports it, and ASRock is keen to point out that the Extreme11 range has plenty of PCIe bandwidth to handle it.

sata, atiradion, gigabyte, asus,
The amount of PCIe bandwidth brings up another interesting element to the Extreme11 range. ASRock feels that their high end motherboard range must support four-way GPU configurations, preferably in x16/16/16/16 lane allocation. In order to do this, along with having enough lanes for the LSI 3008 controller that needs eight, for the X99 Extreme11 there are two PLX8747 PCIe switches on board. We covered the PLX8747 during its prominent use during Z77, but a base summary is that due in part to its FIFO buffer it can multiplex 8 or 16 PCIe lanes into 32. Thus for the X99 Extreme11 and its dual PLX8747 arrangement, each PLX switch takes 16 lanes from the CPU to give two PCIe 3.0 x16 slots, totaling four PCIe 3.0 x16 slots overall. The final eight lanes from the CPU go to the LSI controller, accounting for 40 lanes from the processor. (28 lane CPUs behave a little differently, see the review below.)

As you might imagine, two PLX8747 switches and an LSI controller onboard does not come cheap, and that is why the Extreme11 is one of the most expensive X99 Motherboards on the market at $630+, only to be bested in this competition by the ASRock X99 WS-E/10G which comes with a dual port 10GBase-T controller for $670. Aside from the four PCIe 3.0 x16 slots and 18 SATA ports, the Extreme11 also comes with support for 128GB of RDIMMs, LGA2011-3 Xeon compatibility, dual Intel network ports, upgraded audio and dual PCIe 3.0 x4 M.2 slots. The market ASRock aims for with this board needs high storage and compute requirements in their workstation - typically with these builds the motherboard cost is not that important, but the feature set is. That makes the X99 Extreme11 an entertaining product in an interesting market segment.

With the extra SATA ports and controller chips onboard, the Extreme11 expands into the EATX form factor, which means an extra inch or so horizontally for motherboard dimensions. Aside from the big block of SATA ports, nothing looks untoward on the board, giving an extended heatsink around the power delivery down to the chipset heatsink which has an added fan to deal with the two PLX8747 chips and the LSI 3008 controller.

The socket area is fairly crammed up to Intel’s specifications, with ASRock’s Super Alloy based power delivery packing in twelve phases in an example of over engineering. The DRAM slots are color coded for the black slots to be occupied first. Within the socket area there are four fan headers to use – two CPU headers in the top right (4-pin and 3-pin), a 3-pin header just below the bottom left of the socket (above the PCIe slot) and another 3-pin near the top of the SATA ports. The other two fan headers at the bottom of the board are one 4-pin and another 3-pin, with the final fan header provided for the chipset fan. This can be disabled if required by removing the cable.

The bottom right of the motherboard next to the SATA ports and under the chipset heatsink hides the important and costly controller chips. Combining the two PLX8747 on the left, the LSI RAID controller and the chipset comes north of 30W in total for power use, hence the extra fan on the chipset.

Each PLX8747 PCIe switch can take in eight or sixteen PCIe 2.0 or PCIe 3.0 lanes, then by using a combination of a FIFO buffer and multiplexing output 32 PCIe 3.0 lanes. Sometimes this sounds like magic, but it is best to think of it as a switching FPGA – between the PCIe slots, we have full PCIe 3.0 x16 bandwidth, but if we go up the pipe back to the CPU, we are still limited by that 8/16 lane input. The benefit of the FIFO buffer is a fill twice/pour once scenario, coalescing commands and shooting them up the data path together rather than performing a one in/one out. In our previous testing the PLX8747 gave a sub 1% performance deficit in gaming, but aids compute users that need inter-GPU bandwidth. It also surpasses the SLI fixed limitation of needing eight PCIe lanes, ensuring that the NVIDIA configurations are happy.

The LSI 3008 is a little long in the tooth having been on the X79 and Z87 Extreme11 products, but it does what ASRock wants it to do – provide extra storage ports for those that need it. In order to get a case that can support 18 drives is another matter – we often see companies like Lian Li do them at Computex, and some cost as much as the motherboard. The next cost is all the drives, but I probably would not say no to an 18*6 TB system. The lack of RAID 5/6 for redundancy offerings is still a limitation, as is the lack of a cache. Moving up the LSI stack to a controller that does offer RAID 5/6 would add further cost to the product, and at this point ASRock has little competition in this space.

On the back of the motherboard is this interesting IC from Everspin, which turns out to be 1MB of cache for the LSI controller. There is scope for ASRock to put extra cache on the motherboard, allowing for higher up RAID controllers, but the cost/competition scenario falls into play again.

The final part of the RAID controller is this MXIC chip, which looks to be a 128Mbit flash memory IC with 110ns latency.

Aside from the fancier features, the motherboard has two USB 3.0 headers above the SATA ports (both from the PCH), power/reset buttons, a two digit debug display, two BIOS chips with a selector switch, two USB 2.0 headers, a COM header, and the usual front panel/audio headers. Bang in the middle of the board, between the PCIe slots and the DRAM slots, there is a 4-pin molex to provide extra power to the PCIe slots when multiple hungry GPUs are in play. There is also another power connector below the PCIe slots, but ASRock has told us that only one is needed to be occupied at any time. I have mentioned to ASRock that the molex connector is falling out of favor with PSU manufacturers and very few users actually need one in 2015, as well as the fact that these connectors are both in fairly awkward places. The response was that the molex is the easiest to apply (compared to SATA power or 6-pin PCIe power), and the one in the middle of the board is for users that have smaller cases. I have a feeling that ASRock won’t shift much on this design philosophy unless they develop a custom connector.

The PCIe slots give x16/x16/x16/x16, with the middle slot using eight PCIe 3.0 lanes when in use causing the slot underneath to split causing an x8/x8 arrangement. With sufficiently sized cards, this gives five cards in total possible. Normally we see the potential for a seven card setup, but ASRock has decided to implement two PCIe 3.0 x4 M.2 slots in-between a couple of the PCIe slots. The bandwidth for these slots comes from the CPUs PCIe lanes, and thus do not get hardware RAID capabilities. However, given the PM951 is about to be released, two of them in a software RAID for 2800 MBps+ sequentials along with an 18*6 TB setup would be a super storage platform.

For users wanting to purchase the 28-lane i7-5820K for this motherboard, the PCIe allocation is a little harder to explain. The CPU gives 8 lanes each to the PLX controllers, giving a full x16/x16/x16/x16 solution still applies, with another 8 lanes for the LSI controller. The first M.2 x4 port gets the last four lanes and the second M.2 slot is disabled.

The rear panel gives four USB 2.0 ports, a combination PS/2 port, a Clear CMOS button, two eSATA ports, two USB 3.0 from the PCH, two USB 3.0 from an ASMedia controller, an Intel I211-AT network port, an Intel I218-V network port and audio jacks from the Realtek ALC1150 audio codec.

Eurocom P5 Pro True DTR Laptop Review

The Notebooks as a way to cut the cord and go mobile for long periods of time, but others view the portability as a mere convenience while they move from one power socket to another (e.g. from home to the office). If you’re mostly running with your notebook connected to the power grid and you need the absolute fastest processor possible, there are some interesting options. Clevo is pretty much the go-to option these days for desktop replacements (DTR), with the ability to support full performance desktop processors (including LGA2011 options) and up to two GTX 980M graphics cards in SLI on their top models. Today we’re looking at the next step down from that, the P750ZM that supports Haswell processors up to the i7-4790K and a single GTX 980M graphics chip.

We’ve already seen with the MSI GT72 that the GTX 980M is quite the potent mobile GPU, and in fact the GPU is so fast that there are times (especially at lower quality settings) where it becomes CPU limited. Moving up to an 88W i7-4790K should remove most of the CPU bottleneck, at least at settings anyone is likely to use, so let’s see exactly how fast the 980M can run with a desktop processor.
best laptops, laptops reviews 2015, best laptos 2015, compare laptops, notebooks laptops, gaming laptops, laptops for student

We’ve noted before that there are only a handful of true high-end notebook providers: Alienware, ASUS, Clevo, Gigabyte, and MSI are pretty much it, with a few companies like Razer and Gigabyte’s AORUS brand maxing out at the GTX 970M. We’re working on a review of Gigabyte’s rather slim P35W v3 as well, which is almost insanely thin for a full 980M laptop, but we’ll hold off on further comparisons until that review is ready.

As for the Clevo P750ZM, our sample laptop comes courtesy of Eurocom, where it’s sold as the Eurocom P5 Pro. While Eurocom may offer a few tweaks and options you might not find in stock configurations at other vendors, I have to be brutally honest here and say that there’s not much that separates the various branded Clevo notebooks from each other – Clevo, Eurocom, Sager, or whatever else you want to call it, “A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.” The main factors when buying any Clevo notebook are going to be price and component options.

Of course that doesn't mean there are no differences between the various vendors. Eurocom is one of the few (only?) vendors to offer a TPM 2.0 security chip on the P750ZM, and they also offer Radeon R9 M290X graphics (though at this stage in the life cycle I'm not sure why you'd want to go with AMD's Pitcairn-derived GPU). Finally, Eurocom uses IC Diamond 7 thermal paste on their notebooks, where many vendors charge extra for that feature.

Moving on to the component side of things, Eurocom doesn’t disappoint, with a pretty well fully loaded solution being available. You can choose between several 1080p display options, as well as two different 4K panels (including the 4K Sharp IGZO display in our test sample). Four SO-DIMM slots allow for up to 32GB RAM, there are two M.2 slots (SATA or PCIe supported, though RAID requires SATA), another two 2.5” drive bays, and five USB 3.0 ports (with one being an eSATA combo port). Here are the full specifications for our review unit:

Short of an SLI equipped notebook, this is pretty much the fastest system currently possible, and the only areas left to upgrade over the configuration we’re testing would be via increasing the amount of memory and/or solid state storage. Otherwise, Eurocom sent us the maximum performance/quality configuration in every respect. We’ve got a Core i7-4790K that’s overclockable (more on that later), the GTX 980M, a 4K IGZO display, 16GB of DDR3-1866 RAM, 256GB of SSD storage, and even the optional 330W power adapter (again, more on that later).

Interestingly, Clevo even dropped support for optical drives on this chassis, which seems a bit odd as Gigabyte manages to stuff a slim optical drive into a much thinner 15.6” chassis. Of course, I rarely use optical drives these days so it’s not a huge concern, but it’s something to be aware of. It’s also worth pointing out that battery life isn’t going to be a strong point on this system; even with a large 82Wh battery the high performance components will typically mean two hours of light use while unplugged, and if you want to try doing some gaming you can easily drain the battery in under an hour.

Considering the P750ZM is a full desktop replacement notebook, including an 88W desktop processor, it’s actually surprising that the system isn’t bulkier. Older Clevo models that supported desktop CPUs were often in the 10+ pound range, but the P750ZM is at least reasonably portable at 7.5 pounds. Of course, that’s not including the AC power brick, and with the 330W model we received it tips the scales at an impressive 2.6 pounds (1.2kg) all by itself. Yes, the 330W power brick actually weighs more than some 13” Ultrabooks.

The default 230W adapter should be lighter and less bulky, but there’s a reason for going the 330W route, specifically overclocking. I’m planning a separate article to do a deeper investigation of overclocking potential with the P750ZM, but under full load I’ve seen power draw at the outlet hit 260-270W. At 85% efficiency that would be a 100% load on a 230W adapter, so it’s still possible to use the default adapter and that will save you about $75-$100, but if you’re buying this sort of system it’s probably not a bad idea to opt for the 330W adapter.

Pricing as usual is going to be the biggest obstacle to overcome. There’s no getting around the fact that $2000 is a lot of money for a notebook, and as configured we’ve passed the $3000 mark. I checked around and Eurocom is generally slightly more expensive than some of the other Clevo resellers – and if you’re okay with a preconfigured unit, Amazon has some options as well – but there are differences in the specific RAM and SSD modules so I won’t belabor the point. Obviously this system is designed to set performance records for our notebook test suite, and it does.

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 specs Review

The Lenovo's goal with the X1 Carbon has always been simple: to make the ultimate 14-inch business ultraportable. But the last couple of editions have produced mixed results. The 2013 touch-screen version didn't last long enough on a charge, and the keyboard on last year's model didn't live up to the ThinkPad pedigree. With the third generation of the X1 Carbon (starting at $1,079; $1,754 as tested), Lenovo has made several enhancements, delivering a long-lasting, comfortable and durable workhorse that road warriors will want to own.

new lenovo laptops, best laptops 2015, best notebook 2015, acer laptops, samsung, smartphone 2015, laptops reviews

As svelte, sturdy and classically handsome as ever, the X1 Carbon is an all-black ultraportable with a bottom made of magnesium and aluminum. The display cover uses carbon-fiber and glass-fiber reinforced plastic, and the hinges are reinforced with carbon fiber. The design isn't flashy, but it's tough and does a good job of resisting fingerprints. The gently pulsating red dot above the "i" in the ThinkPad logo and the red TrackPoint add small dashes of color. Why so much carbon fiber? Lenovo says it's as strong as aluminum but a third of the weight. Lenovo also claims that the Carbon passes eight MIL-Spec tests (MIL-STD 810G) for everything from low and high temperatures to humidity, sand and shock.

This is in addition to Lenovo's own drop, flex and spill tests. For instance, Lenovo spills 500 cc (or close to 17 ounces) of water on the X1 Carbon. The X1 Carbon is among the lightest 14-inch laptops we've tested. It weighs just 3.07 pounds, compared to the aluminum-clad EliteBook Folio 1040's 3.4 pounds. The newer, 12.5-inch EliteBook Folio 1020 is 2.7 pounds. The Dell XPS 13 2015, which has a touch-screen display, weighs 2.8 pounds. Measuring 13 x 8.9 x 0.73 inches, the Lenovo is a little thicker than the EliteBook 1040 (0.63 inches) and the XPS 13 (0.68 inches).

the Lenovo has made two big changes to the X1 versus the previous edition: It ditched the innovative but confusing Adaptive Function Row for a more traditional Function row and added dedicated mouse buttons for the TrackPoint. I'm happy to say that both changes add up to a much better ergonomic experience. Gone are the capacitive Function keys above the QWERTY layout, which lit up with different symbols depending on the app you were using. Now, there are more traditional shortcut keys for things such as volume, brightness, settings, task switching (very handy) and displaying all of your apps. The result is something that's less ambitious but more practical. I'm glad to see that Lenovo enlarged the Backspace key on this X1 Carbon, too. Based on our measurements, the X1 Carbon's backlit keyboard delivers 1.86 mm of travel, paired with an actuation force of 58 grams. Both of these numbers compare favorably to the HP EliteBook Folio 1020 (1.65 mm, 60 grams) and the Dell XPS 13 (1.2 mm, 60 grams). More travel usually means a more desktoplike feel.

 Source : Laptopmag